↳ TLDR
↳ KEY RESULTS
29.5% lift on new A/S enrollments (including Set Schedule, Smart-Stash and Round Ups)
66.4% lift on turning Set Schedule ON (both new and existing users)
33.0% lift on new Set Schedule Enrollments
41% conversion on Mixpanel

↳ HOW IT STARTED

Before starting iterations on the allocation modal, I had a conversation with the lead marketing designer and she mentioned that there was a Set Schedule cash potential graph on the marketing site that was performing really well with acquisition.
Taking a look at the graph, I realized that this design could be directly applied to the allocation tool, as well as investments.
My hypothesis was that users would see this graph and be motivated to increase their allocation amount, or motivated not to churn if that was their original intention.


↳ TEST #1
We ran moderated testing with 10 people in our target market, testing graph comprehension and reactions to different types of investment graphs.
Users were excited to see and interact with the graphs in our prototype, surprised at how much money they could have saved if they'd started investing earlier.
We found that there was significant confusion between the two lines on the graph for the cash graph (cash vs. generic 5% growth).
We also found that users understood volatility, and were drawn to Match the Market as the investment they were most comfortable with (Moderate gains, little volatility). Surprisingly, participants commented that safe ETFs like Park my Cash were "not worth it."

↳ CAMPAIGN #1
For our first Marketing campaign, we tested a guided flow with iOS users, made in Braze.
Question: Can we get users with Set Schedule off to turn it on for cash or for an investment by showing them a growth potential graph?
Audience: We sent a push notification to 60,000 users who had been inactive on the platform for over 30 days.
Results:
65.86% lift on set schedule on
36.98% lift on first set schedule enroll
31.86% lift on first auto stash enroll

↳ CAMPAIGN #2
Question: Is the growth potential graph or the Stock details page causing conversion? Is interactivity important in the growth potential graph?
We tested 3 variants:
A) Control push to match the market
B) Static historical graph
C) Interactive historical graph
Both B and C had significant lift over A, and B and C performed about the same. This told us that we could use a static graph or a graph with set price points and still get similar conversion (which was a lower dev lift).

↳ FINAL DESIGNS
While the original prompt was to add the potential graph to the allocation modal for existing Set Schedule users (with the thought that we'd show a graph for every investment), we decided that it would be more beneficial to put it on the Auto-Stash home screen for users with Set Schedule off (and show cash potential graph instead, as well as recommended investments for retirement).
The new value prop allows users to see the impact of turning on Set Schedule for cash or an investment before opting into the feature. This highlights the power of habitual saving and investing through the use of an interactive graph and slider component that the user can move up and down to see their Auto-Stash potential.
Phone: +1 929 293 7758
Email: sarahhayleyarmstrong@gmail.com
© Sarah Armstrong 2024

